A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CLONIDINE VERSUS FENTANYL AS ADJUVANTS TO EPIDURAL BUPIVACAINE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ELECTIVE LOWER LIMB SURGERIES

Authors

  • Lavanya M. P. Consultant, Department of Anaesthesiology, K C General Hospital, Malleshwaram, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. Author
  • Harini Priyadarshini M. S. HOD & Senior Consultant, Department of Anaesthesiology K C General Hospital, Malleshwaram, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. Author
  • Amarnath C. Consultant, Department of Anaesthesiology K C General Hospital, Malleshwaram, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India Author
  • Surendra M. Consultant Anaesthesiologist, Veena Medical Center, Rajajinagar, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65605/a-jmrhs.2026.v04.i02.pp2284-2291

Keywords:

Clonidine, Fentanyl, Bupivacaine, Epidural Anaesthesia, Postoperative Analgesia.

Abstract

Background: Epidural adjuvants improve the quality and duration of analgesia while reducing the dose requirement of local anaesthetics. Clonidine and fentanyl are commonly used epidural adjuvants, but their comparative efficacy remains a subject of interest. This study aims to compare the effects of clonidine and fentanyl as adjuvants to epidural bupivacaine in patients undergoing elective lower limb surgeries. Materials and Methods: This prospective, randomized comparative study was conducted over 18 months and included 60 ASA physical status I and II patients aged 18–60 years undergoing elective lower limb surgeries. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups (n = 30 each). Group BC received 16 mL of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine with clonidine (1 μg/kg), while Group BF received 16 mL of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine with fentanyl (0.5 μg/kg). The primary outcomes included onset and duration of sensory and motor block, and secondary outcomes included time to two-segment regression, duration of postoperative analgesia, haemodynamic parameters, sedation score, and adverse effects. Results: Group BF demonstrated a significantly faster onset of sensory block (6.3 ± 0.79 vs. 11.5 ± 0.82 minutes) and motor block (16.9 ± 1.32 vs. 24.2 ± 1.10 minutes) compared with Group BC (p < 0.001). However, Group BC showed significantly prolonged two-segment regression time (268.2 ± 0.38 vs. 109.2 ± 0.27 minutes), duration of sensory block (307.8 ± 0.47 vs. 147.0 ± 0.34 minutes), duration of motor block (292.8 ± 0.42 vs. 133.8 ± 0.35 minutes), and time to first rescue analgesia (307.8 ± 0.47 vs. 207.6 ± 0.34 minutes) (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). The incidence of adverse effects, including hypotension, bradycardia, and nausea/vomiting, was comparable between the two groups (p = 1.000). Conclusion: Epidural clonidine (1 μg/kg) as an adjuvant to bupivacaine provided significantly prolonged sensory and motor blockade and longer postoperative analgesia than epidural fentanyl (0.5 μg/kg), without increasing adverse effects. Therefore, clonidine may be considered an effective and safe alternative to fentanyl for epidural anaesthesia in elective lower limb surgeries.

Downloads

Published

20-06-2026

How to Cite

A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CLONIDINE VERSUS FENTANYL AS ADJUVANTS TO EPIDURAL BUPIVACAINE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ELECTIVE LOWER LIMB SURGERIES. (2026). Asian Journal of Medical Research and Health Sciences, 4(2), 2284-2291. https://doi.org/10.65605/a-jmrhs.2026.v04.i02.pp2284-2291

Similar Articles

1-10 of 78

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.